169 N.J. Super. 524 - State v. Ingenito’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1985
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Prestidge v. United States · State v. Gonzalez · State v. Thomas · United States v. De Angelo · State v. Whitaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Had the second trial immediately followed the verdict in the first, and to the same jury, there would have been no need to repeat the evidence of the possession which the jury heard and passed on in its return of the first verdict. [ 169 N.J.Super. at 533 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ragland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.