Kosier v. Derosa’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2024
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schulke Radio Productions, Ltd. v. Midwestern Broadcasting Co. · Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co. · 151 Ohio St. 522 - Allen, Heaton & McDonald, Inc. v. Castle Farm Amusement Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determination of the existence and amount of the lost profits is a question of fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) profits were within the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made, (2) the loss of profits is the probable result of the breach of contract, and (3) the profits are not remote and speculative and may be shown with reasonable certainty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.