Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 Okla. 15 - Pappe v. Law

Pappe v. Law’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1954
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1954

6 state decisions

20193419401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville · Winona Oil Co. v. Barnes · Miller v. Madigan · 101 Cal. App. 365 - Burlingame v. Traeger · Eagle Loan & Inv. Co. v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a fundamental principle of jurisprudence that material facts or questions which were in issue in a former action, and were there admitted or judicially determined, are conclusively settled by a judgment rendered therein, and that such facts or questions become res judicata and may not again be litigated in a subsequent action between the same parties or their privies, regardless of the form the issue may take in the subsequent action, whether the subsequent action involves the same or a different form or proceeding, or whether the second action is upon the same or different cause of action, subject matter, claim or demand, as the earlier action.....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The sheriff cannot set himself up as a court of review to determine the legality and validity of a writ regular upon its face. He is a ministerial, not a judicial, officer, and must execute all orders or process of the court regular and valid upon its face.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.