Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 Okla. 401 - Tucker v. Ware

Tucker v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 1953
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1953

10 state decisions

60193419401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacobs v. Colcord · Fidelity Funding Co. v. Vaughn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The same rule is more clearly stated in the ease of Jacobs v. Colcord, 136 Okla. 158 , 275 P. 649 , where the second syllabus paragraph is as follows: “ ‘A garnishment proceeding is no more than a substitution of the plaintiff for the defendant debtor in the enforcement of any liability against the garnishee, and therefore the plaintiff can acquire no greater rights against the garnishee than the debtor himself possessed or could enforce’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.