Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 Okla. 598 - Dees v. Dees

Dees v. Dees’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 1976
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1976

7 state decisions

3019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hutson v. McConnell · Johnson v. Johnson · Kelly v. Blackwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A person acting as administrator may purchase the interest of an heir in such estate when the heir is sui juris and laboring under no disability and where no undue influence is exerted and all circumstances of the transaction are fair and open and no advantage is taken of such heir by concealment, misrepresentation, or omission to state any important fact. In such cases, however, the court looks upon such transactions with a jealous eye, and will not uphold them unless it appears that such transactions are fair and there is no fraud or concealment. Dees v. Dees, 169 Okl. 598 , 38 P.2d 508 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.