Haven v. Munson’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2000
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McClendon v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. · Daigle v. Moody · Jones v. Landry · Cole v. List & Weatherly Const. Co. · Carter v. Christ
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to an employee, unfamiliar with intricate machinery ..., the hopper would appear to him as no more a guard or protection than any other part of the gin.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The hopper or barrier which plaintiff removed was not there solely as a protection to employees, but served to form part of the gin as well.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.