Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 SO3D 902 - Cates v. Woods

Cates v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 564 So. 2d 1346 - Palmer v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center, Inc. · 466 So. 2d 856 - Hall v. Hilbun · 629 So. 2d 595 - Daniels v. GNB, Inc. · 954 So. 2d 951 - Hubbard v. Wansley · 684 So. 2d 591 - Catchings v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “expert testimony is generally required to survive summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.