169 Tex. Crim. 313 - Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1990
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 163 Tex. Crim. 279 - Fite v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 583 - Hemmeline v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The jury was entitled to know that the defendant on trial had control of a pistol as well as a motor vehicle while he was intoxicated. Proof of the circumstances surrounding the commission of an offense which form a part of the occurrence are admissible.” See also Yaffar v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 341 , 349 S.W.2d 730 ; Dowdy v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 385 S.W.2d 678 ; Morgan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 395 S.W.2d 644 ; Beeler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 374 S.W.2d 237 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stilwell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.