Claud v. Pulley’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1950
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ross Cutter & Silo Co. v. Rutherford · Nethers v. Nethers · W. L. Lawrence & Son, Inc. v. Merkel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The provisions of section 6345 of the Code are evoked by the defendant to the end that this court may require the record in the lower court to be here produced for the purpose of showing that the testimony in this case was marked, ‘Filed, J. L. M., March 24, 1936.’ “The effect of this would be adding to the record by this court, in derogation of the statutes above referred to and the rule of this court, cited, and the decisions pointed out, upon an exparte assertion that the alleged omitted matter exists.” “This we cannot do and we have no volition in the matter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Steingold v. Seaton““The defendant, in answer to the motion to dismiss the appeal, cites to this court the decree from which the appeal was allowed. The formal part of the decree brings on the case with the usual recital of the various steps taken, which includes the depositions of witnesses taken on behalf of the complainant and respondents, ‘this day filed.’ “We do not think that this supplies the absent requirement referred to.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Steingold v. Seaton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.