State v. Bashaw’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neder v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · 126 Wash. 2d 244 - State v. Powell · 147 Wash. 2d 330 - State v. Brown · 106 Wash. 2d 772 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause this is a criminal case, all twelve of you must agree in order to answer the special verdict form,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bea · State v. Nunez“Retrial of a defendant implicates core concerns of judicial economy and finality. Where, as here, a defendant is already subject to a penalty for the underlying substantive offense, the prospect of an additional penalty is strongly outweighed by the countervailing policies of judicial economy and finality.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ryan“[A] unanimous jury decision is not required to find that the State has failed to prove the presence of a special finding increasing the defendant's maximum allowable sentence. A nonunanimous jury decision is a final determination that the State had not proved the special finding beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nunez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.