State v. Tibbles’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Welsh v. Wisconsin · Dorman v. United States · State v. Hendrickson · 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]nalysis under article I, section 7 begins with the presumption that a warrantless search is per se unreasonable, unless it falls within one of the carefully drawn exceptions to the warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tamblyn“`(1) hot pursuit; (2) fleeing suspect; (3) danger to arresting officer or to the public; (4) mobility of the vehicle; (5) mobility or destruction of the evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swetz“To find exigent circumstances based on these bare facts would set the stage for the exigent circumstances exception to swallow the general warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swetz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.