¶1¶75 (concurrence in dissent) — I agree with Justice Sanders that RCW 9A.46.110 is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation and that the rule of lenity requires that we find for the defendant. Therefore, I would reverse.
169 Wash. 2d 537
State v. Kintz
Decided August 26, 2010
Washington Supreme Court · decided 2010-08-26
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2025
3 state decisions
Applies WA 9A § 9A.46.110
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2010-08-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →