Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 WASHAPP 228 - State v. O'Cain

State v. O'Cain’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Puckett v. United States · Pointer v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “protects the integrity ofjudicial proceedings by denying a defendant the opportunity to sit on his rights, bet on the verdict, and then, if the verdict is adverse, gain a retrial by asserting his rights for the first time on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]rror may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless .. . a timely objection or motion to strike is made, stating the specific ground of objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a state appellate rule may not be utilized so as to undermine ... a United States Supreme Court holding as to the scope or extent of a federal constitutional right”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.