169 Wis. 2d 341 - State v. Windom’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 219 Wis. 2d 615 - State Ex Rel. Warren v. Schwarz (1998), State v. Williams (2002)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · United States v. Casamento
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'reasonably or fairly susceptible of more than one construction.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is defined by the classic example of the gall displayed by a young man who, after he is convicted of murdering his parents, seeks leniency because he is an orphan. See L. ROSTEN, The JOYS OF YIDDISH 93 (Pocket Book 1970). 10 See State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 804 , 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979) (”[I]t is a prerequisite to a claim of ineffec- five representation on appeal to preserve the testimony of trial counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when it revoked his probation for failing to admit guilt during probationary treatment. ¶ 55. Because the State never promised or assured Warren that he would be able to maintain his innocence for purposes other than the plea itself, we conclude that the State did not breach its Alford plea agreement with Warren when it revoked his probation in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.