Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 Wis. 2d 566 - State v. Solles

169 Wis. 2d 566 - State v. Solles’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · 102 Wis. 2d 461 - Grobarchik v. State · 113 Wis. 2d 544 - State v. Hegwood · 121 Wis. 2d 670 - State v. Martin · 119 Wis. 2d 327 - State v. Krueger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`original dispositional scheme,' and therefore the circumstances at the time of the original sentence, control the resentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when resentencing a defendant the trial court must consider only the circumstances existing when defendant was first sentenced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the sentence must be based upon the circumstances as they existed when the original sentence was imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.