169 W. Va. 150 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Harris v. McRae · 158 W. Va. 905 - State v. Starr · 162 W. Va. 467 - State v. Vance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a showing that the recording device was capable of taking testimony; (2) a showing that the operator of the device was competent; (3) an establishment of the authenticity and correctness of the recording; (4) a showing that changes, additions or deletions have not been made; (5) a showing of the manner of the preservation of the recording; (6) an identification of the speakers; and (7) a showing that the testimony was voluntarily made without any kind of inducement.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[w]ith regard to evidence bearing on any material issue, including the credibility of witnesses, the trial judge should not intimate any opinion, as these matters are within the exclusive province of the jury.' Syllabus Point 4, in part, State v. Burton, 163 W.Va. 40 , 254 S.E.2d 129 (1979).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.