Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 169 W. Va. 430 - Manning v. Inge

169 W. Va. 430 - Manning v. Inge’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2010

16 state decisions

601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc. · 165 W. Va. 588 - State v. Clawson · State Ex Rel. Brown v. Dewell · Harris v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'One is in jeopardy when he has been placed on trial on a valid indictment, before a court of competent jurisdiction, has been arraigned, has pleaded and a jury has been impaneled and sworn.’ Syl. pt. 1, Adkins v. Leverette, [ 164 W.Va. 377 ], 264 S.E.2d 154 (1980).”); see also Syl. Pt. 4, Manning, 169 W.Va. at 430-31 , 288 S.E.2d at 179 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We have generally followed the United States Supreme Court’s holdings with regard to when jeopardy attaches, as summarized in United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co., 430 U.S. 564, 569 , 97 S.Ct. 1349, 1353 , 51 L.Ed.2d 642, 650 (1977): ‘The protections afforded by the [Double Jeopardy] Clause are implicated only when the accused has actually been placed in jeopardy_ This state of jeopardy attaches when a jury is empaneled and sworn, or, in a bench trial, when the judge begins to receive evidence.’ (Citations omitted) See Syllabus Point 1, Adkins v. Leverette, 164 W.Va. 377 , 264 S.E.2d 154 (1980); Syllabus Point 4, Manning v. Inge, 169 W.Va. 430 , 288 S.E.2d 178 (1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Jeopardy attaches in a non-jury trial in a magistrate court which is exercising proper jurisdiction when the accused has been charged in a valid warrant and has entered a plea and the magistrate has begun to hear evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.