Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Abb. Pr. 86

Morris v. Morange

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1863

New York Supreme Court · decided 1863-12-15

This action was brought by William A. Morris and George Kissam, executors, against Henry H. Morange and others, for the foreclosure of a mortgage: plaintiffs had judgment, and defendant Morange appealed. An order was made at Kings Special Term, directing that the notice of appeal from the judgment in this action, served on the clerk, be set aside and taken from the files of the court, on the ground that it was not served within thirty days- after notice of the judgment.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1863-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1910

3 state decisions

10186318701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.*—Sorugham, J.

¶1Section 332 of the Code requires that an appeal must be taken within thirty days after written notice of the judgment or order shall have been given to the party appealing.

¶2The appeal is taken by the service of a notice .in writing on the adverse party, and on the clerk with whom the judgment or order appealed from is entered, stating the appeal from the same, or some specified part thereof. (Code, § 327.)

¶3The time to appeal, in this case, expired with the 19th day of March, 1863, and on that day the defendant Morange deposited in the post-office, in Rew York, a notice of appeal, addressed to the plaintiff’s attorney, “ Brooklyn, E. D.” and another to the “ Clerk of Kings County, Brooklyn.”

¶4The object of section 332 is to limit the time within which appeals may be taken to thirty days, and unless notice is actually served on the clerk within that time, the right to appeal is lost. The Code and statutes have provided, that service of certain papers may be made in a manner therein specified; but, in the absence of such particular statutory provision, service of a written notice pan only be made by the delivery of the paper *88to the person upon whom it is to be served. An actual manual delivery may not be necessary, but the receipt of the paper by the person to be served is essential.

¶5The provisions of the Code (§§ 410, 411), for service by mail, only allow such service upon parties to actions and their attorneys; and while they render the service of the notice of appeal upon the plaintiff’s attorney in this case sufficient, they * have no such effect as to the notice which the defendant was required to serve upon the clerk.

¶6The notice mailed to the clerk was .not received by him until the 23d of March, 1863, four days after the time to appeal" expired.

¶7The order should be affirmed.

¶8 Present, Brown, Scrugham, and Lora, JJ.

/17/abbpr/86 · .json · Public domain