Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 AD2D 243 - People v. Mishkin

People v. Mishkin’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
May 1968
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Schneider v. State · Talley v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The District Attorney suggests that the statute may be found constitutional if its application is limited to obscene publications for there would be a purpose in facilitating the discovery of the publisher. But the statute itself is not so limited, and there is nothing to indicate that this was the legislative purpose. We do not reach the question whether such a purpose would validate the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.