Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 A.D.3d 998

Fitzgerald v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2005-04-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2008

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-04-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise, J.), entered May 4, 2004. The interlocutory judgment ordered that a trial on the issue of damages be scheduled.

¶2It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

¶3Same memorandum as in Bradford v State of New York (17 AD3d 995 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

/17/ad3d/998 · .json · Public domain