Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 Ala. App. 119 - Folkes v. State

17 Ala. App. 119 - Folkes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1991

20 state decisions

60191919201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · Hawes v. State · McAnally v. State · Washington v. State · Bales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that Saunders and Folkes had a difficulty or altercation over a card game, the nature and gravity of such difficulty, was clearly admissible.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.