17 Ala. App. 276
84 So 394
Decided December 16, 1919
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1919-12-16
Mann Mims was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and lie appeals. Counsel discussed the assignments of error, but without reference to the points cited in the opinion.
Relies on Haynes v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed and remanded · Decided 1919-12-16
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 1976
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The affidavit was made before the probate judge, and warrant was issued and made returnable to the county court. There was no judgment in the county court, no appeal bond, no demand for a jury; in fact, nothing appears in the record to give the circuit court jurisdiction. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325.
¶2 The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
¶3 Reversed and remanded.