Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 Ala. App. 294 - Cannon v. Dillehay

17 Ala. App. 294 - Cannon v. Dillehay’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 1984
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1984

8 state decisions

4019191920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Capital City Insurance v. Quinn · Cline v. Guthrie · Wood v. Wood · Flansberg v. Heywood Bros. & Wakefield Co. · Costelo v. Barnard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “note has no legal inception or valid existence, as such, until it has been delivered in accordance with the purpose and intent of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.