¶1
¶2
¶3 Affirmed.
17 Ala. App. 328
85 So 36
Decided January 16, 1920
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1920-01-16
<p>1. Criminal Law <©=>1090(16, 17) — Motion for New Trial and in Arrest not Re-' viewed without Bill of Exceptions.</p> <p>Motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment appearing in the record will not be reviewed in the absence of bill of exceptions.</p> <p>2. Criminal Law <©=>1090(14), 1122(5) — In Absence of Oral Charge and Bill of Exceptions Refused Charges not Passed Upon.</p> <p>Where the oral charge of the court and bill of exceptions are not incorporated into the rec-. ord, refused charges will not be passed upon by the Court of Appeals.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1932
1 state decisions
Relies on 16 Ala. App. 393 - Ross v. State · Climer v. St. Clair County Telephone Co. · Savage v. Mathews
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1920-01-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1
¶2
¶3 Affirmed.