Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Ala. App. 345

84 So 860

Smith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1920

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1920-02-03

<p>Criminal Law <@=>1001 — Conviction Affirmed After Time for Filing Bill of Exceptions.</p> <p>Where there is no bill of exceptions and the time for filing same has expired and the record is free from error, a judgment of conviction will be affirmed.</p> <p><§=>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in ail Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1920-02-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1983

5 state decisions

201920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKEN, P. J.

¶1 The defendant was indicted for the offense of grand larceny and convicted as charged. From the judgment of conviction, he appeals to this court. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing same has long since expired. The record is free from error; the judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

¶2 Affirmed.

/17/alaapp/345 · .json · Public domain