Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Ala. App. 347

85 So 823

Cook v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1920

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1920-02-03

Loyd Tate, Judge. Lib Cook and Maggie Holt were convicted of living' together in a state of adulterous fornication, and they appealed. The evidence did not make out a case, and the defendants were entitled to an acquittal. 4 Port. 467; .29 Ala. 313.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1954

2 state decisions

Relies on Brown v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1920-02-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SAMFORD, J.

¶1 To sustain a conviction for the offense of adultery or fornication, there must he proven by the state, beyond a reasonable doubt, either hy direct evidence or hy facts and circumstances that will warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion that there has been at least one act of illicit intercourse, with an agreement between the defendants, either expressed or implied, to continue the relation whenever opportunity offered and they so desire. Brown’s Case, 108 Ala. 18, 18 South. 811.

¶2 We have examined the record in this case and the evidence utterly fails to justify a conviction, but rather indicates that the prosecution. was in retaliation for one of the defendants and her two sons having testified against one of the state’s witnesses in a' prosecution against him.

¶3 The motion for a new trial should have been granted.

¶4 Reversed and remanded.

/17/alaapp/347 · .json · Public domain