17 Ala. App. 627
88 So 189
Decided December 14, 1920
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1920-12-14
<p>Criminal Law &wkey;1124(4) — Motion for New Trial not Reviewed where Evidence not Shown by Record.</p> <p>Motion for new trial will not be reviewed where there is no showing as to what evidence was offered in connection with the motion.</p>
Relies on 16 Ala. App. 393 - Ross v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1920-12-14
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1989
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The defendant was convicted of robbery, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of 10 years. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and the time for presenting and(having one signed has expired.
¶2 The motion for a new trial will not be reviewed, as there is no showing as to what evidence, if any, was offered in connection with the motion. Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 South. 309.
¶3 There is no error in the record, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
¶4 Affirmed.