Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 ARKAPP 7 - Bunker v. Bunker

Bunker v. Bunker’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2010

8 state decisions

401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tucker v. Johnson · Meisch v. Brady · White v. Ray · Taggart v. Moore · Rice v. Kroeck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence (not allegations) sufficient to justify the refusal to grant a directed verdict against the party required to show the meritorious defense. In other words, it is not necessary to prove a defense, but merely present sufficient defense evidence to justify a determination of the issue by a trier of fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.