Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 BTA 86 - Hayes v. Commissioner

Hayes v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 1985

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501929193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * But a gift may not be claimed as a deduction for tax purposes by the device of taking a note for the amount of the gift. And this we deem so, even though the note may be legally enforcible, if there is no intent to enforce the note or reason to believe when taken that it can not be collected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.