17 Cal. 596
Decided July 1, 1861
California Supreme Court · decided 1861-07-01
Plaintiff sues to recover four hundred and forty-five dollars rent of certain property described in the complaint, claiming as the purchaser of the premises at Sheriff’s sale under a decree in the case of Kline v. Chase, a former suit between the same parties. The defendant here was the judgment debtor there.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1861-07-01
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1957
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Cope, J. concurring.
¶2Judgment affirmed, for the reasons given by the Judge below in his opinion. It is unnecessary to state these reasons, since the principles governing the case have already been settled in Harris v. Reynolds, (13 Cal.) and other cases.
¶3See Knights v. Truett, 18 Cal.