Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 CAL4TH 1184 - People v. Peevy

People v. Peevy’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2022 · most notably Missouri v. Seibert (2004), 22 Cal. 4th 900 - People v. Jenkins (2000)

73 state decisions

5001998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Mincey v. Arizona · Moran v. Burbine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n appellate court generally is not the forum in which to develop an additional factual record . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`the determination whether statements obtained during custodial interrogation are admissible against the accused is to be made upon an inquiry into the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation, to ascertain whether the accused in fact knowingly and voluntarily decided to forgo his rights to remain silent and to have the assistance of counsel. [Citation.]' [Citation.] When determining whether a juvenile's waiver is voluntary, courts should consider the juvenile's `age, experience, education, background, and intelligence, and . . . whether he has the capacity to understand the warnings given him, the nature of his Fifth Amendment rights, and the consequences of waiving those rights. [Citation.]' [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “intended to protect the exercise of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by persons undergoing custodial interrogation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.