Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 CAL4TH 658 - People v. Lloyd

People v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 30 Cal. 4th 643 - In Re Chavez (2003), People v. Mendez (1999)

54 state decisions

420199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 3 Cal. 3d 595 - People v. West · 18 Cal. 3d 889 - People v. DeVaughn · 19 Cal. 3d 1 - People v. Kaanehe · People v. Panizzon · 36 Cal. 3d 909 - People v. Sumstine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in substance, .... challenges the validity of the plea”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a judgment of conviction is entered upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere [in the superior court], the defendant shall, within 60 days after the judgment is rendered, file as an intended notice of appeal the statement required by section 1237.5 ...; but the appeal shall not be operative unless the trial court executes and files the certificate of probable cause required by that section. Within 20 days after the defendant files the statement the trial court shall execute and file either a certificate of probable cause or an order denying a certificate and shall forthwith notify the parties of the granting or denial of the certificate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “No appeal shall be taken by the defendant from a judgment of conviction [in the superior court] upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere ..., except where both of the following are met: [¶] (a) The defendant has filed with the trial court a written statement, executed under oath or penalty of perjury[,] showing reasonable constitutional, jurisdictional, or other grounds going to the legality of the proceedings. [¶] (b) The trial court has executed and filed a certificate of probable cause for such appeal....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.