Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Cust. Ct. 370

Altman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 10, 1946

United States Customs Court · decided 1946-10-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1947

Relies on United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1946-10-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Cole, Judge

¶1(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items= of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tajq described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (e)). United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

¶2An agreed set of facts shows export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

/17/custct/370 · .json · Public domain