Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 F.2d 1008

Docket No. 1925.

Devine v. Pfau

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 17, 1927.

Decided March 7, 1927.)

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1927-03-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1949

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. L. Norris and C. A. Bateman, both of Washington, D. C., and Wm. Abbe, of New York City, for appellant.

¶2G. F. De Wein, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and GRAHAM, Presiding Judge U. S. Court of Customs Appeals.

¶4ROBB, J.

¶5Appeal from concurrent decisions of the tribunals of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, in which priority was awarded Pfau, who was first to conceive and first to reduce to practice. For the reasons fully stated’ by the Patent Office, we affirm the decision.

¶6Affirmed.

/17/f2d/1008 · .json · Public domain