Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 F.2d 12 - Bronstein v. United States

Bronstein v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

17 F.2d 12 · 1927

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
November 1980
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1980

13 federal appellate ·

401927193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bartell v. United States · Allen v. United States · Silkworth v. United States · Buchanan v. United States · Massey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The liquor, in all probability, resembled gin as closely as it did any recognized preprohibition liquor. Most modem hard liquors, aside from their flavor, come from the same still, and it is a matter of commón knowledge that a few drops of the oil of juniper constitutes these days the difference between beverage alcohol and so-called gin.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.