Culhane v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.2d 559 · 1927
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1999
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Central Railroad Banking Co of Georgia v. Pettus · Thompson v. Phenix Ins Co of Brooklyn N Y · Porter v. Sabin · William Booth v. Ferdinand Clark · Union Nat Bank of Chicago v. Bank of Kansas City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such allowances to the counsel for defendant are rarely proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.