Matzger v. Vinikow’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.2d 581 · 1927
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1981
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Company v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Company · Lawrence Manuf'G Co v. Tennessee Manuf'G Co · Stevens v. Gladding · St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Wenzel · Regis v. H. A. Jaynes & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * where an injunction is had against unfair competition, willfully conducted by the defendant with knowledge of the plaintiff’s rights, an accounting normally follows. (Citing cases.)” Matzger v. Vinikow, 9 Cir., 17 F.2d 581 at page 584.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.