Bendel v. Nagle’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.2d 719 · 1927
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably Pino v. Nicolls (1954), Rodriguez-Herrera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lewis v. Frick · Anna Lapina v. William Williams · Weedin v. Tayokichi Yamada · Takeyo Koyama v. Burnett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The crime (carnal knowledge) of which appellant was convicted is usually classed as rape, the statute simply raising the common-law age of consent, and such a crime manifestly involves moral turpitude. * * *””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.