King v. Dutton’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.3d 151 · 1994
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably United States v. Salerno (1995), Ruelas v. Wolfenbarger (2009)
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Rosenberg v. Comerica Bank · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Shugrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant need only be aware of the direct consequences of the plea; ... the trial court is under no constitutional obligation to inform the defendant of all the possible collateral consequences of the plea.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"A conviction's possible enhancing effect on subsequent sentences has been held to be merely a collateral consequence of a guilty plea, about which a defendant need not be advised, even when there was a pending investigation into the charge upon which the subsequent sentence was based. United States v. Brownlie, 915 F.2d 527, 528 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Edwards, 911 F.2d 1031, 1035 (5th Cir.1990) [And more relevant to the instant case,] [c]ourts also have held that a defendant need not be advised that a conviction based on a guilty plea can be used in a subsequent prosecution resulting from a pending investigation. See United States v. Campusano, 947 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1991); United States v. Jordan, 870 F.2d 1310, 1317-18 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 831 , 110 S.Ct. 101 , 107 L.Ed.2d 65 (1989)." King v. Dutton, 17 F.3d at 153-54 (1994).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“relevant circumstances and likely consequences.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.