Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 F.3d 185 - Sivard v. Pulaski County

Sivard v. Pulaski County’s Empirical Analysis

17 F.3d 185 · 1994

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Baxter ex rel. Baxter v. Vigo County School Corp. (1994), Palmer v. Marion County (2003)

19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

310199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Gerstein v. Pugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]oilerplate allegations of a municipal policy, entirely lacking in any factual support that a city policy does exist, are insufficient.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “government officials performing discretionary functions, generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.