Haupt v. Td Dillard’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.3d 285 · 1994
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Pinaud v. County of Suffolk (1995), Taylor v. Meacham (1996)
31 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Gerstein v. Pugh · Carey v. Piphus · Albright v. Oliver · Tumey v. State of Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he constitutional foundation for a claim of malicious prosecution under § 1983 is a matter of dispute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In fact, the probable cause determination was necessary to the judgment; the sole purpose of the preliminary hearing was to determine whether [plaintiff] should have been bound over for trial. But for the probable cause determination, there would have been no trial and no judgment of acquittal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Probable cause to continue a prosecution may disappear with the discovery of new exculpatory evidence after the preliminary hearing ... [and] state actors who ... suppress [this evidence] may be liable for malicious prosecution....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Geness v. Cox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.