United States v. Brandon’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.3d 409 · 1994
Citation profile
219 federal appellate · 34 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 317 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably United States v. Dure (1999), United States v. Ellis (1997)
219 federal appellate · 34 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1084 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 20 · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3013 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Bagley · Irvin v. Dowd · Carnegie v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 317 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“less culpable than the average participant”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[wjhoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice— (1) to defraud a financial institution; or (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial insti tution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises[.]”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any plan, pattern or course of action, including false and fraudulent pretenses and misrepresentations intended to deceive others in order to obtain something of value.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.