United States v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
17 F.3d 723 · 1994
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably United States v. Pettigrew (1996), United States v. Sanders (2003)
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1813 · 12 U.S.C. § 1817 · 12 U.S.C. § 36 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 20 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Burks v. United States · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Carstea v. Poplar Tree Homeowners Ass'n · United States v. Monton · Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“continually cautioned the Government that its failure to adequately prove the jurisdiction element might one day require the reversal of bank fraud convictions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As this Court has repeatedly and consistently stated”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Certainly we recognize the possibility that we or our sister Courts may some day be faced with an insufficiency of the evidence of insurance ... which would warrant reversal. Indeed, we have difficulty comprehending why the Government repeatedly fails to prove this element more carefully since the Government’s burden is so simple and straightforward. As in the other cases we have discussed, the Government treads perilously close to reversal in this case, and may soon find itself crossing the line from sufficiency to insufficiency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.