Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 F.3d 729 - McGill v. Goff

McGill v. Goff’s Empirical Analysis

17 F.3d 729 · 1994

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Kansa Reinsurance Company Ltd v. Congressional Mortgage Corporation of Texas United Postal Savings & Loan Assn (1994), Lorraine Grace v. Robert Rosenstock (2000)

10 federal appellate ·

170199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Nettles v. Wainwright · Walker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Hill v. Duriron Co. · Hill v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so contrary to [the plaintiffs'] alleged understanding of the deal that upon review of the document, [the plaintiffs] would have been put on notice of [the defendant's] alleged fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “summary judgment evidence indisputably establishe[d] that [the plaintiffs] were aware of the falsity of [the defendant's] alleged representations in the summer of 1985.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.