Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 F. App'x 81

Edmonds v. Dodrill

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 15, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-08-15

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2016

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Josué Edmonds appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Dodrill, No. CA-01-175-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 6, 2001; entered Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/17/fappx/81 · .json · Public domain