United States v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 2000
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 666
Relies on Salinas v. United States · United States v. Pretty · United States v. Moeller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person authorized to act on behalf of another person or a government and, in the case of an organization or government, includes a servant or employee, and a partner, director, officer, manager, and representative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he assessor's primary function is to assess the value of real property within the parish for the parish ad valorem property tax. In performing those duties, he is clearly acting as an agent of the parish.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“testimony at trial indicated that the St. Helena Police Jury provided funding to the assessor's office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.