Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 17 FSUPP2D 193 - Sauer v. Xerox Corp.

Sauer v. Xerox Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
August 2009
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6501

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Filmline Productions Inc v. United Artists Corporation · Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. New York Times Co. · General Supply & Construction Co. v. Goelet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is undisputed that Sauer’s only written notice to Xerox concerning Xerox’ alleged failure to pay renewal rent came by letter ... one day after this suit was filed”); Karabu Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 1997 WL 759462 , at n. 8 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 1997) (plaintiff gave no notice of alleged breach); SVS, Inc. v. Rabbit Ears Productions, Inc., 1992 WL 91183 , at (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 1991) (plaintiff’s notice of default failed to include”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.