Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

17 Ga. 88

Shannon v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1855

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1855-01-15

Ca. sa. in Sumter Superior Court. . Decision by Judge Perkins, August Term, 1854. Wm. E. Stevens being arrested under a ca. sa. gave bond, with security, for his appearance at the next term of the Court. When the case.was called, Stevens failing to appear, judgment was entered upon the bond against him and Harvey Shannon, his surety.

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Fixing Bail”

Decided 1855-01-15

¶1By the Court.

Benning, J.

¶2delivering the opinion.

¶3In cases of this sort, the Statute requires the condition of. the bond to be for the appearance of the defendant in ea. sa. at the term of the proper Court,, to be held next after the arrest, “'then and there to stand to and abide by such proceedings as may be had by the Court, in relation to his, her or their taking the bénefit of” the Statute.

¶4The bond, in this case, is in substantial compliance with this requisition.

¶5The condition of the bond having to be for the appearance of the defendant, to abide by such “ proceedings” as may be had by the Court, it is not performed unless the defendant appears time enough in the term to admit of “the proceedings”' by which he is to abide, to be had.

¶6And of these proceedings it may happen that an issue for a Jury, on a suggestion of fraud by the plaintiff in ca. sa. may make a part.

¶7The condition of the bond, therefore, is not performed unless the defendant appears time enough in the. term to admit of such an issue being formed, and if not continued, being tried, by a Jury. That is to say, the condition is hot performed, unless the defendant appears before the Juries shall have been discharged. (Cobb’s Dig. 386.)

¶8[1.] But on the other hand, if the appearance is at any time* before the Juries are discharged, the condition is performed. And appearance, at such a time, makes every object,of the Statute capable of being accomplished. As long as the Court has *90its Juries, it has what will enable it to transact all “the proceedings” of which the case is susceptible. • •

¶9In this case, the surety having produced the body of his principal, the defendant in ca. sa. three days before the close of the term, produced him, it is to be presumed, before the Juries had been discharged. He therefore produced him in Reason.

¶10The Court, therefore, should have granted the surety’s motion, to have the judgment set aside and himself exonerated from the bond.

¶11It is not meant to be said, that if the case is not called until after the Juries shall have been discharged, an appearance a,t the time when it is called, will not be sufficient.

/17/ga/88 · .json · Public domain