¶1The action being by the personal representative of a decedent, and it appearing that the witness by whom the defendant sought to prove the plea of payment was the defendant’s agent and likewise interested in the result of the suit, the exclusion of the testimony of this witness was proper. Judgment affirmed.
17 Ga. App. 760
McIntyre v. Jones
Decided March 27, 1916
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1916-03-27
<p>Appeal; from Cobb superior court — Judge' Patterson. July 22, 1915,</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1917
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1916-03-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →