FLORES’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder (2009), Jean Patrick Michel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2000)
34 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1426 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Jordan v. De George · Moore v. United States · New York Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners · United States Volpe v. Smith · United States v. Citizens Utilities Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to conduct which is inherently base, vile, or depraved, contrary to the accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between man and man, either one's fellow man or society in general.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where fraud is inherent in an offense, it is not necessary that the statute prohibiting it include the usual phraseology concerning fraud in order for it to involve moral turpitude”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was convicted under that clause of the statute which merely prohibits any offense against the United States”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Notash v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.